There is a lot of emphasis on Facebook’s youth demographic decreasing and how messaging apps like Snapchat, LINE, WhatsApp and KakaoTalk are becoming the new Facebook and I can’t help but to think: wow, people don’t understand product and technical differences.
Facebook is a social networking platform. Messaging apps are tools for communication.
It’s not that people are leaving Facebook or Instagram for messaging apps, it’s that people are using messaging apps as tools to communicate differently.
There is room for both in the world. It’s just that people are choosing how to talk to those they want to talk to (messaging apps), rather than putting themselves out there for everyone and – literally – their mothers to see (Facebook).
So just like how most people don’t want to socialize with tens and hundreds of people every second of every day, many are choosing to socialize with people in different ways. And they are doing so with photos, videos, text and content.
Facebook and messaging apps are two different things.
Now don’t write off these stats because the source is Royal Pingdom. That site is like BGR (Boy Genius Report) — not credible until recently. Look where Royal Pingdom pulled their stats. ht @percival
[...]But the meat of the partnership is in a long term deal where Foursquare users can check into stores in Lucky’s coveted “Shopping Directory,” which includes nearly 700 stores in 30 states and 72 cities, and earn the “Lucky” badge. Once users check-in to a Lucky recommended store, users can read tips from Lucky editors about each boutique or store. The idea is to give users editorial insider scoop, a.k.a. incentives, to check-in. User who check-in to these boutiques may also receive discounts and or deals at some locations. Lucky’s long-term strategy is compelling; they want to co-sponsor “boutique crawls” (similar in idea to pub crawls) for users to earn deals and badges.
NYT, HBO, NBCU (Bravo), History Channel, Zagat, and now a partnership with Conde Nast (old media) — major props to Foursquare for being one of the first social networks to successfully bridge old/new media.
Folks, this is history in making.
When I think of social media, megaphoning immediately pops into my head so that photo to the left, depicts exactly how I imagine social media to be.
Well, I am pleasantly surprised at how 2010 is starting out.
For example, the other day I came across a post from one of my favorite people in the whole entire world, Micah Baldwin, about how 2010 is the year of people. Micah is someone who gets along with anyone and everyone, so from the title of the post, I had no clue what he actually meant.
After reading his post, I understood — he’s interested in making meaningful connections with smaller numbers of folks, instead of spending five minutes with the bajillions of persons who tries to talk to him at conferences and such. I absolutely concur. Besides, aren’t quick convos what Twitter is for?
“When someone tells you to Digg, Reddit, StumbleUpon, RT something, you don’t ask questions. You just, do it.”
No one ever told me that’s what I was supposed to do…and apparently there are a lot more rules I am oblivious to. I’m one of those anomalies who started out backwards. Where most people in my circle have been blogging and socially networking since the start of the Internet, I just came out of nowhere. In June 2008, I only had a MySpace, Facebook, and randomly blogged on MySpace and Facebook. I found FriendFeed by accident, and it was over – I got addicted to social networking.
This blog started because of FriendFeed, I connected to a lot of people because of the people I met on FriendFeed, but really? I love technology and I love people. The Internet and sharing what I find on the Internet is my hobby. I blog because I have a lot to say. It’s really that simple.
Doing what I love to do for a living means monetizing. And once monies get involved, it’s a whooole ‘nother world. I understand only sharing finds on the Internet and interacting with people won’t get you paid (unless you’re Gizmodo or ICANHAZ.)
Remember hickeys? I do.
I’ve had two hickeys my whole entire life and both were pretty unpleasant experiences. The first, I was around 14ish (I think) and happy to finally be included in the hickey club. All the cool kids were in that club, so I felt cool too…until I realized how much effort was required to hide the damn thing. It hit me early on, that outside of school hickeys were just big, purple, markings faaaar from cool and well…simply gross. I stopped talking to the guy who gave it to me and made it clear to those who came after him, if they dared even attempted leaving a hickey, I’d drop kick them in the head.
The second, was in my early 20s.
I was going on an all girl Vegas trip and my bf at that time left the biggest, meanest, purplest, most disgusting hickey on my left neckline a day before the trip. I remember the shock of being so caught off guard. We were in our 20s. Who leaves hickeys? WHO? …and (really) blurted out of irritation: WTF am I? A frickin’ fire hydrant? Don’t mark your territory like an EFin dog! before kicking him to the curb. As much as I liked him, insecurity* = do. not. want, and to this day, he still thinks I am a nut-job who broke up with him over a hickey (not confirmed).
So in my mind, hickeys are GROSS.
Nowadays, hickeys have stepped its game up and gone digital. It’s allllll about subtly marking territories on Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, et al., by leaving detailed wall posts spilling personal business for all to see, or uploading and tagging photos of the two of you. The various ways people leave digital bits is pretty hilarious and telling. All I know is, digital or not, hickeys = DO NOT WANT.
That said, dating is now a lot easier, thanks to social networking sites. Filtering potentials is so much easier. I can tell a lot about another person just by their Facebook or Myspace pages. If a guy I just met had digital hickeys all over their pages, I would definitely run the other way.
Reason no. 897928374 I really really love the Internet. ;)
*Just in case he’s reading this, he wasn’t all that insecure. We were together during my peak partying years. I was working a 9-5, bartending for fun at clubs on the weekend, and partying when I wasn’t working or bartending… so I understand. But as wild as I came off, I never did anything to make anyone be insecure.
As soon as I saw the URL, I knew The Wired story was fake*. Since I’ve been harping about accountability , news source reliability, retraction, responsibility, question all sources — regardless of it’s trusted journalists and or publications lately, I thought this would be a good chance for me to prove my point: Think before repeating or spreading information.
Turns out, this was the biggest mistake I made. Continue reading
Before you judge me, there is good reason for my lameness.
So given this opportunity, I may as well let it all out, and have Google index this post forever and ever and… googleplex? Whatever. But heck, we only live once, right? So here goes:
- I suck at accepting compliments. I have foot in the mouth moments and come off sounding… well… stupid.
- “Queen of FriendFeed” MORTIFIES me. Though flattering, deemed “Queen of XXX” brings me back to first grade, and how a 4th grader beat me up for telling her I was the “queen of the playground”. So I learned the hard way: Do not boss people around or try to be something you’re not — and I am definitely not a queen of a Social Networking site.
- Focused attention (even if it’s good) embarrasses the CRAP out of me. (my face is flaming red, even right now). When I get embarrassed, I get flustered. When I am flustered, I ramble, and when I ramble, I’m incoherent and incoherent people = not fun to listen to.
Given my past blunders, when the time comes to show appreciation, I repeatedly tell myself: “MONA KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND STICK TO SIMPLY SAYING THANK YOU” … so that’s what I did.
That said, at the risk of sounding like a complete cornball, I am going to attempt articulating what I mean by my “Thank you”s.
I came across monitter.com and wow, it might make me use Twitter more.
What made me stop and check the site out, was the UI. I have NO patience for hunting and pecking to learn how to use a site. I certainly don’t read help or about pages to learn how to use the site. So I am a huge fan of intuitive UIs — opening the site and jumping right in. Monitter is exactly that, and became an instant fan.
Monitter is independent from 3rd party apps like Adobe Air! And beyond the interface, the features are useful. It’s like TweetDeck, except it’s web based. Has a search engine like Summarize, but updates Real Time and customizable.
Some more additonal features and funtions:
- Default layout is three columns — but adjustable. Each column queries its own #search based on the Twitter API. You can add up to as many columns of keyword Tweets as you want. (I stopped adding columns at 10, since they’re vertically displayed)
- Location searches: You can set Monitter to only display Tweets within X miles of X location. Neat
- Language: Set Monitter to display Tweets in four languages: English, Spanish, Dutch, and French. (no Asian language support — yet)
- Free embeddable widget for your site. (I downloaded it but it’s kinda huge (dimension wise) — no thanks)
- As a bonus, it’s written in jQuery. (I’m a fan)
Conclusion: A definite must check out.
I like it more than TweetDeck, Twhirl, Summarize, and any other Twitter app I’ve used.
Do you use Twitter? If so, what’re your favorite Twitter apps?
If George W. Bush and John Kerry campaigned for the presidency on the Internet four years ago, I wouldn’t have seen the point and likely would have laughed in their faces. Who would have heard and listened to them? Fast forward to today, and the joke is on me.
In case you haven’t noticed, both of the presidential hopefuls have a presence on the web. John McCain and Barack Obama have accounts on the major social networks, including MySpace, Facebook, YouTube channels, and even Twitter accounts. Social networking is no longer just for geeks. Web 2.0 is going mainstream and everyone (that means you, reader!) has opportunity to be more than an audience. Data is democratizing and everyone’s voice can be heard.
Need more proof everyone has a voice that’s heard? Take the Steve Job’s false report of a heart attack debacle. A simple post on CNN’s affiliate citizen journalism site, iReport, generated a massive ripple effect. Within minutes, the unconfirmed “news” spread like wild fire. CNN and Apple quickly issued official statements that report was false, major blogs picked up the story of falsified reports, but Apple’s stock still dropped 10%. All from one silly rumor, started by a Joe Schmoe from who knows where. Everyone has opportunity to be heard. Hence, democratization of data.
So what does that mean?
Well, stay with me, as I take this a step further. Most of you probably know me through FriendFeed, where I spend almost 90% of my days posting random pictures and or links. Now FriendFeed was once dominated by veteran bloggers, Internet personalities, – basically folks who have been around for some time, and put years of efforts into their well deserved titles by their names – or the tech ‘elite’. It’s now been a little over three months since I signed up, and still can’t believe I interact with the information sources where tech-news (data) start and circulate around. But honestly? The ‘elite’ in my eyes, are regular people who are a part of the FriendFeed I love so much. And it’s not constrained to FriendFeed. Whether you or anyone else for that matter, likes it or not, there are so many people from all walks of life, from all over the world sharing and discussing information on all social networks across the board. How can every single voice not be heard? Again, democratization of data. And this is only the beginning.
Think about it.
New sites and services are popping up every month. Established, major Social Networks such as MySpace and or Facebook are adding features, functions, and tools encouraging users to share data. The way Social Networks will be used are changing. There are millions of active users like us, sharing our personal stories, the latest news, information pertaining to our professional life, or even stupid cat photos since we – the users, have the choice and control to share whatever we feel is important to share. The bottomline: Information is no longer consolidated, centralized, or coming from a few selected sources. Data is now and will only continue to be democratized.
The path is now paved, so the choice is yours. How will you exercise these options?
So I’ve been active on FriendFeed for about 3 full months, and just when I thought my love affair would end, FriendFeed rolled out a re-design with added features. With the new list function, I can organize and manage information better than before, thus making me even more addicted.
I’m not going to lie – FriendFeed’s search function is still premature, and filtering information flow is nearly impossible. Even with lists, it’s still tough to filter the constant information overload since most people on FriendFeed – regardless of their occuptions or titles, share a plethora of subject matters. Because of the chaotic, unorganized nature of our feeds (which I love), most FriendFeeders utilize the list function by grouping people, and creating their own filters. Louis Gray’s “With FriendFeed Lists, I Start to Organize the Noise“, and Mike Fruchter “My A,B,C’s of FriendFeed” are two great examples of how they manage their information flow. Robert Scoble even hand picked close to 200 people he feels gives him the information he’s looking! Wow, talk about dedication!
Like Louis, Mike, Robert, and the rest, FriendFeed is my aggregator. But aside from information gathering, FriendFeed is now my one stop spot of choice for all my daily Internet needs. From socializing, news, funny pictures, gadgets, bizarre finds, wacky stories – everything I love about the Internet is on FriendFeed. (For a more indepth look, head on over to Mark Wilson’s post: 10 Reasons I Love FriendFeed. Mark sums up why I love FriendFeed beautifully!)
Since my interests range is so diverse, plus I don’t want to exclude anyone I’m subscribed to in fear of missing out on their shares, I chose to work with the features FriendFeed provides to fit my needs, and group a little differently. So perhaps, if you’re like me, my method will be helpful to you. :)
The past few days, I’ve attempted life as a ‘normal person‘. Going out with friends, dates, bars, and today, I even had an ‘average Sunday’ — Sunday brunch, Sunday errands, lazy Sunday in a park, then Sunday coffee with my friends, complete with the Sunday paper.
As I was playing Sudoku, my mind started wandering, and the numbers morphed into icons of various Social Media networking sites I participate in. Then I realized, I may have a problem. I am addicted to the Internet, especially Social Networking Sites. (image via: troller.com, a site randomly found Googling for a visual to add to this post.)
I am signed up for over 20 different services, and the list of new accounts keep growing. Since I’m signed up for an abundance of services, it may seem as though ‘clone’ sites are spawning, but I disagree. It’s quite exciting to see how these ‘clone’ sites integrates and appropriates various features and functions of their predecessors to fit their own formulas. Just like how cars, gadgets, and electronics keep getting ‘better’, I firmly believe Social Networking sites do, as well.
To omit redundancy, I separate everything via purpose of the respective services so I’m not overloaded, overwhelmed, or bored by all these sites. I’ve learned to quickly distinguish which sites I will participate in, or not. Continue reading
I understand full customization ie: filter, group filtering, is not yet available. BUT there are ways to help reduce ‘noise’ per se. So um, can we all focus on the positive in lieu of the negative? Please? Thanks. :)
So spill it, what do you guys hide?
via: SF MOMA’s Press Room
Note the last paragraph:
“We have heard the concerns that have been expressed, and we hope that online discussion concerning SFMOMA can now return to focus on the terrific exhibitions we currently have on view and the many exciting public programs that we are offering to support them. We thank you for your comments.”
Whether I agree or disagree with SF MOMA’s statement and how they handled the situation, is a different story. Consider:
- Thomas Hawk told his side of the story.
- Called for action by ‘digg’ing his piece.
- SF MOMA responded.
The point is: they issued a statement.
So now, I wonder: Was this because of Digg? Is the collective power of the Internet / social media / social networking influential? If so, how do we – responsibly – utilize these outlets moving forward? Thoughts and / or suggestions, anyone?
Follow-up video for “Back to the old Facebook”…? YES PLEASE”
I’m still using the old Facebook, what about you?
If you’re using the new Facebook, what do you like about it? Am I missing out on something great??
In case anyone’s wondering, a quick update regarding the Thomas Hawk SF MOMA fiasco. I called SF MOMA’s PR Department at 3:00 p.m. ish and politely inquired with two people on two separate phone calls:
- If they are aware of the Thomas Hawk incident.
- If they are planning to issue a statement.
- When they plan on doing so.
- Where they plan on issuing the statement.
- Yes, they are.
- Yes, they are.
- No exact ETA, but probably by the end of the day.
- Trying to decide which outlet to utilize.
Update @ 5:47 pm: I followed up with another individual in the PR Department and iterated that I am extremely eager in hearing their side of the story. This person kindly and politely informed me they are still working on the statement, and will release it as quickly as possible. I then asked (again): How will I know it’s posted?” She replied: “You will know, that’s all I can say at this time….. -pause-”, and we filled the awkward silence with simultaneous laughter.
Btw, all the conversations with the SF MOMA’s PR Department were amicable and positive.
Let me begin by stating: I do not know Thomas Hawk personally, and only correspond with him via FriendFeed.
That said, I came across his blog post about the SF MOMA incident. His case (to me) is pretty clear.
- SF MOMA allows photography.
- Despite its policies, SF MOMA’s Director of Visitor Relations, Simon Blint, personally threw out Thomas Hawk (a patron).
- Thomas Hawk wants an explanation as to why this occurred.
I, too, would like to see an explanation. Consider that SF MOMA’s website states:
“Cameras: Photography is not permitted in the galleries. Flash photography is permitted only with a handheld camera in the Atrium.”
I’m no photographer and technical terms go over my head, but it sounded like he was complying with the written rules.
- Thomas Hawk was shooting with a DSLR (Digital single-lens reflex camera).
- He was not shooting with a tripod.
- He was not shooting with a flash.
Granted, this is only one side of the story, but if the Director of Visitor Relations personally threw Thomas out… would he, or any employee of SF MOMA, respond to Thomas Hawk’s inquiry? Furthermore, what happened to Thomas could’ve happened to anyone. And that’s (precisely) what made me feel so strongly about this issue. I’m not the only one.
Several people decided to share Thomas Hawk’s story by “liking” or “re-sharing” via FriendFeed, “Digging” the piece, and sharing their Digg support on their FriendFeed streams. The process, annoyed several FriendFeeders, and useful information stemmed from those voiced annoyances.
In case anyone’s wondering, this is how I navigate my way around FriendFeed :) *warning, not for people who get motion sickness, since I scroll super duper fast…
Mike Fruchter across the web:
So, how do you FriendFeed?
Capture your own video with Jing Project (free)
P.S. It cut off at a really weird place, but ya. This is only one of the reasons why I love FriendFeed so much :) Btw, please excuse my inarticulateness. It’s my first video!
P.P.S. The higher quality version with annotations is available at Youtube. I’m having problems embedding, here.
I’m seeing Facebook announces “Great Apps”, “new tools” stories everywhere and I can’t be the only who doesn’t care about it… am I? Actually, the first thought that came to mind was do.not.want. I don’t know about you, but I’ve yet to come across an application I would actually log into Facebook for.
Seriously.. how useless are these applications?